Alexander Shcheglov

Alexander has five years of experience in representing his clients in courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. He participated in the preparation of complaints to the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.

Alexander defended his thesis with honors on the topic “Features of arbitration courts considering disputes arising from the implementation of public-private partnership projects” and specializes in resolving litigation disputes arising at the stage of concluding concession agreements in connection with the validity of ongoing PPP projects, as well as on compensation problems when concession agreements are terminated early.

Alexander's most significant projects include:

• Representing the concessionaire in a dispute initiated by a group of administrative plaintiffs to declare illegal the regulatory legal act that approved the PPT and PM, as a result of which it became possible to continue creating a linear facility based on the model of a concession agreement.
• Protection of legal entities that have concluded concession agreements without a tender (CCI) from claims filed by a group of persons whose applications for their readiness to participate in the tender were rejected, to declare agreements null and void, and to challenge the results of the consideration of applications.
• Representing the grantor in a dispute over the recovery of unjust enrichment from the concessionaire. The result of the consideration of the case was the signing of a settlement agreement, which actually includes the full recognition of the opponents of the claims.
• Protecting the interests of a public entity from a request to recover funds for the disposal of solid household waste. After the courts of first instance and appeal satisfied the claims, the court of cassation returned the case for a new trial, as a result of which the client's interests were protected by the courts.

Alexander has five years of experience in representing his clients in courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. He participated in the preparation of complaints to the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.

Alexander defended his thesis with honors on the topic “Features of arbitration courts considering disputes arising from the implementation of public-private partnership projects” and specializes in resolving litigation disputes arising at the stage of concluding concession agreements in connection with the validity of ongoing PPP projects, as well as on compensation problems when concession agreements are terminated early.

Alexander's most significant projects include:

• Representing the concessionaire in a dispute initiated by a group of administrative plaintiffs to declare illegal the regulatory legal act that approved the PPT and PM, as a result of which it became possible to continue creating a linear facility based on the model of a concession agreement.
• Protection of legal entities that have concluded concession agreements without a tender (CCI) from claims filed by a group of persons whose applications for their readiness to participate in the tender were rejected, to declare agreements null and void, and to challenge the results of the consideration of applications.
• Representing the grantor in a dispute over the recovery of unjust enrichment from the concessionaire. The result of the consideration of the case was the signing of a settlement agreement, which actually includes the full recognition of the opponents of the claims.
• Protecting the interests of a public entity from a request to recover funds for the disposal of solid household waste. After the courts of first instance and appeal satisfied the claims, the court of cassation returned the case for a new trial, as a result of which the client's interests were protected by the courts.